Kyle Krol was placed in a situation
similar to many new teachers in America. She was handed a curriculum and told
to teach it. So many young fresh teachers (like myself) can find this
staggeringly limiting to our ability and our knowledge base. Kyle was well
versed in multicultural literature and modern writers, but instead of being
able to teach to her strengths Kyle was forced to teach “dead white guys.”
Being a relatively huge fan of the
“dead white guys” I would probably thrive in this school. I could teach
hawthorn, poe, or Thoreau with ease and with pride. But I stronglt disagree
with the pigeonholing that goes on with standards in America. Teachers should
have the freedom to teach what they are strongest at and should be hired
accordingly. Am I saying Kyle Krol doesn’t deserve a job? No. What I am saying
is a principal should have seen in an interview how uncomfortable Kyle was and
tried to find a candidate more suited to the class that was being offered. This
is only true however, if there are schools in the area with a more open
curriculum. If not, then I would go as far as to say that education in that
particular area is about to die.
A good point is made that standards
should be worked from the bottom up. It should not be a box but a foundation to
build onto. To find ways to incorporate new authors and new cultures and still
build off of the set standards to ensure teachers are teaching to their
strengths and students are staying on track for graduation. If this is successfully
achieved then the standards can remain strong and even be built upon until America
can be at the top in education.
No comments:
Post a Comment